I spent time to understand the different between you and janfi67. I asked questions and looked at why and how. I do not question the merits of your arguments I would be mutual and unable to speak. The only thing we can all regret is that the situation is blocked. We have enough strikes like that ;-) And if other jurisdictions are involved, we do not know where it might lead. In any case, nobody wins. I would ask you make peace with janfi67 behalf of Georges Brassens' die for principles, agree, but a slow death!
janfi67 I fully understand that paying attention to what he does not sell CD-R, patched or not RT3MapEditor. I agree with him: there are crooks who openly sell copies without the original CD and I also disagree. Navteq either does not appreciate it!
I sold my old departing original CD on eBay and I was asked about the possibility of a CD-R. I then suggested some sales with an original CD + CD upgrade the RT3 and a CD-R application, stating that it is necessary to open the blister of the original CD to CD-R, or asking the buyer to provide a list of lift for a CD-R patched. My goal was to offer a bonus to users who could not afford to make their own CD-R. It's still not a CRIME! The price of these sales did not exceed the price that is usually done on eBay for an original CD ONLY, well below the price concession. How I made money by exploiting RT3MapEditor?
You say you use RT3MapEditor? If a friend who knows nothing about computer asks you to modify his original CD, do you refuse him? And if you offer a drink in appreciation, is it that you are a pirate and you make money with RT3MapEditor?
janfi67 must take care not to fall into the paranoid. I read on a forum that was patched maps on eMule. If he knows he'll go crazy! It seeks not to understand and discuss the arguments of others. He is content to defame and immediately bear different in the public square by publishing private information!
Is not that surprised that other people react and defend themselves. I am the first to recognize that this is an excellent computer, to congratulate him and thank him for his brilliant freeware-that is the same as my blog-
If his way of thanking someone is to violate his rights and steal his work, I can not imagine what happens to those against whom he has a tooth.
but that does not give him the right to launch fatouah.
It is true that in this respect, we have a specialist: "RT3MapEditor, death of a child, janfi67, engineering to paranoia" . That is probably what he calls "keep calm and dignity" ?
In a forum, he responded to someone who spoke to him saying " our master ES RT3 " Ouhla ... especially not master of anything ... I have a big mouth, I let you imagine if I catch more big-headed. I see that he recognizes sometimes. I want to do the same in the different between us. I wrote: I regret to state our differences on the public square. I respect the tremendous job you did on the software RT3MapEditor, but I do not allow you to publish any private information about me or making accusations that can pass for harassment, violation of privacy and defamation. I am ready to put an end to this unnecessary conflict because there are enough elsewhere. I am ready to withdraw my complaint and if this blog did the same and remove any private information on forums and blog. I have already told him that the ball is in his court.
------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
Goodnight ,
I have not seen the pink elephant that crossed the road and I fell into the river ! Seriously how good distraction while driving? telephone, GPS, radio etc. .... so why jeopardize a person like that? it is a bit limited as reasoning!
OK, everything reasoning is limited, but if it puts others involved, we must accept it too.
------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- Hello
,
You criticize therefore almost all current GPS but also warning radars. I think from your point of view, they have much more responsibility than a single developer in his corner ... I advise you therefore request also has to TomTom AlerteGPS Inforad ... Keeping in mind that this accident is a tragedy, I find it amusing to take part in a person who does not sell its software so that companies live up to the àdisposition list of radars and others who produce millions "of 'alerter "GPS. I do not see why you try to do the trial Janfi67. Greetings
Why is it alone in the trial?
------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- Hello
,
All this is very strange, all GPS devices display current radar, why software offering to display it on an incomplete system could be responsible for an accident? What is the point or purpose of such desperation? raphk34
The reasons have already been exposed.
------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Why put
him because he is not the only nor the first. Other sites are charging the introduction of speed cameras on GPS systems and other nomadic people also watch the phone while driving ......... driving: NOT BETTER, smoking while driving: NO BEST .......... and if the radars were in real danger zones and not in areas with tickets, would not it be more effective against unfortunate accidents ......... yes but unlike some janfi67 RT3MapEditor created in a non-profit but simply to integrate the radar on a road map that lacked voluntarily. Let me explain, manufacturers (PSA / Citroen) asked Navtech can not integrate these cameras on road maps they provide for their RT3/RT4 because it is a paying service that all users of PSA / Citroen may acquire a fee we can better understand now why and how.
Another topic that could put a flea in his ear some and annoy ...
------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
I find your fiction in very bad taste. in that case why do not you complain to the manufacturers of GPS devices that integrate all radars. it's pretty petty of you to take Janfi67 which seems to be within its rights to not want to use some of its software to make money while he himself does not. Sincerely, a user of RT3MapEditor.
janfi67 I fully understand that paying attention to what he does not sell CD-R, patched or not RT3MapEditor. I agree with him: there are crooks who openly sell copies without the original CD and I also disagree. Navteq either does not appreciate it!
Very strange contradiction. Michel C. disapprove the sale of a copy without an original, but that is what he does. By selling on eBay UK 2004/2005 card impatchable original and one copy necessarily more recent with radar. It's also what he does with his web sites or against the sum of 25 € send you a copy card with radar but without an original.
And once again, not a word about the license RT3MapEditor! He sits on it!
And once again, not a word about the license RT3MapEditor! He sits on it!
I sold my old departing original CD on eBay and I was asked about the possibility of a CD-R. I then suggested some sales with an original CD + CD upgrade the RT3 and a CD-R application, stating that it is necessary to open the blister of the original CD to CD-R, or asking the buyer to provide a list of lift for a CD-R patched. My goal was to offer a bonus to users who could not afford to make their own CD-R. It's still not a CRIME! The price of these sales did not exceed the price that is usually done on eBay for an original CD ONLY, well below the price concession. How I made money by exploiting RT3MapEditor?
Fifteen eBay listings, some with very catchy titles like "Drive smart: keep your points and give less money to replace cars blue ..." photos support, cards with pictures of modified its copyright pucesland, 4 web sites, some of which he proposes or the entire Catalog Navteq, 25 € for a map pirate radar he calls it "offer a bonus to users who could not afford to make their own CD-R ? Would it not rather trade with a nice speech marketing to lure customers? Finally, given the number of piracy laws and licensing that Michel C. violated?
I recall here the average price (end of November 2007) 2006/2007 of 25 cards: 50 €. The average price of radar maps with this gentleman: 85 € or 35 € more per card. That's how he earns money with RT3MapEditor. His
piracy is not a crime, but a FELONY.
I recall here the average price (end of November 2007) 2006/2007 of 25 cards: 50 €. The average price of radar maps with this gentleman: 85 € or 35 € more per card. That's how he earns money with RT3MapEditor. His
piracy is not a crime, but a FELONY.
You say you use RT3MapEditor? If a friend who knows nothing about computer asks you to modify his original CD, do you refuse him? And if you offer a drink in appreciation, is it that you are a pirate and you make money with RT3MapEditor?
He recruited his friends on eBay and on Web sites by selling you counterfeit? Michel C. has a strange conception of friendship ...
janfi67 must take care not to fall into the paranoid. I read on a forum that was patched maps on eMule. If he knows he'll go crazy! It seeks not to understand and discuss the arguments of others. He is content to defame and immediately bear different in the public square by publishing private information!
Another big lie. In August 2007, I contacted Michael C. August 14 at 9:10, he wrote: "Hello
,
After a sleepless night thinking (yes), I want to say that I understood the lesson
.
I also count on your understanding to accept my apology.
Sincerely,
MC "
It then changed name on eBay, has a new name domain and starts his illegal sale September 13! It is not to say we can trust him and he keeps his word. I see it on November 2. I call him and he plays the innocent who does not understand, who do not know what it is! So I told him my intention to complain. And I
who "do not try to understand" which "defames his door and immediately changed on the public square" ? I have yet contacted privately, and never talked about his piracy before it starts. What choice left me then? let me hack it without saying anything?
,
After a sleepless night thinking (yes), I want to say that I understood the lesson
.
I also count on your understanding to accept my apology.
Sincerely,
MC "
It then changed name on eBay, has a new name domain and starts his illegal sale September 13! It is not to say we can trust him and he keeps his word. I see it on November 2. I call him and he plays the innocent who does not understand, who do not know what it is! So I told him my intention to complain. And I
who "do not try to understand" which "defames his door and immediately changed on the public square" ? I have yet contacted privately, and never talked about his piracy before it starts. What choice left me then? let me hack it without saying anything?
Is not that surprised that other people react and defend themselves. I am the first to recognize that this is an excellent computer, to congratulate him and thank him for his brilliant freeware-that is the same as my blog-
If his way of thanking someone is to violate his rights and steal his work, I can not imagine what happens to those against whom he has a tooth.
but that does not give him the right to launch fatouah.
It is true that in this respect, we have a specialist: "RT3MapEditor, death of a child, janfi67, engineering to paranoia" . That is probably what he calls "keep calm and dignity" ?
In a forum, he responded to someone who spoke to him saying " our master ES RT3 " Ouhla ... especially not master of anything ... I have a big mouth, I let you imagine if I catch more big-headed. I see that he recognizes sometimes. I want to do the same in the different between us. I wrote: I regret to state our differences on the public square. I respect the tremendous job you did on the software RT3MapEditor, but I do not allow you to publish any private information about me or making accusations that can pass for harassment, violation of privacy and defamation. I am ready to put an end to this unnecessary conflict because there are enough elsewhere. I am ready to withdraw my complaint and if this blog did the same and remove any private information on forums and blog. I have already told him that the ball is in his court.
------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
Goodnight ,
I have not seen the pink elephant that crossed the road and I fell into the river ! Seriously how good distraction while driving? telephone, GPS, radio etc. .... so why jeopardize a person like that? it is a bit limited as reasoning!
OK, everything reasoning is limited, but if it puts others involved, we must accept it too.
------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- Hello
,
You criticize therefore almost all current GPS but also warning radars. I think from your point of view, they have much more responsibility than a single developer in his corner ... I advise you therefore request also has to TomTom AlerteGPS Inforad ... Keeping in mind that this accident is a tragedy, I find it amusing to take part in a person who does not sell its software so that companies live up to the àdisposition list of radars and others who produce millions "of 'alerter "GPS. I do not see why you try to do the trial Janfi67. Greetings
Why is it alone in the trial?
------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- Hello
,
All this is very strange, all GPS devices display current radar, why software offering to display it on an incomplete system could be responsible for an accident? What is the point or purpose of such desperation? raphk34
The reasons have already been exposed.
------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Why put
him because he is not the only nor the first. Other sites are charging the introduction of speed cameras on GPS systems and other nomadic people also watch the phone while driving ......... driving: NOT BETTER, smoking while driving: NO BEST .......... and if the radars were in real danger zones and not in areas with tickets, would not it be more effective against unfortunate accidents ......... yes but unlike some janfi67 RT3MapEditor created in a non-profit but simply to integrate the radar on a road map that lacked voluntarily. Let me explain, manufacturers (PSA / Citroen) asked Navtech can not integrate these cameras on road maps they provide for their RT3/RT4 because it is a paying service that all users of PSA / Citroen may acquire a fee we can better understand now why and how.
Another topic that could put a flea in his ear some and annoy ...
------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
I find your fiction in very bad taste. in that case why do not you complain to the manufacturers of GPS devices that integrate all radars. it's pretty petty of you to take Janfi67 which seems to be within its rights to not want to use some of its software to make money while he himself does not. Sincerely, a user of RT3MapEditor.
0 comments:
Post a Comment