Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Sweet Pattycake Shower

janfi67 above the law?

In advance, here is the excerpt from the article that mentions the right to make a copy of Backup: " Art. L. 122-6-1. II. The person having the right to use the software can make a backup copy when it is necessary to preserve the use of the software. " It is thus enabled to make a backup copy of a CD which was the license for its own use, the more so to preserve the original against theft or heat in his vehicle. Navteq
mentions in its license agreement: " Using the database is limited to the specific system for which it was created. Except as expressly provided by law, you may not extract or reuse one or more substantial portions of the contents of the database or reproduce, copy, modify, adapt, translate, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer any part of the database. "As
RT3MapEditor is directly affected by this excerpt, it is hoped that THE APPROVAL Navteq, even if it is not mentioned in the license agreement of software RT3MapEditor. If it does not, RT3MapEditor only solution is to argue that it falls within the backup software (Nero and others) and to refer to the Art. L. 122-6-1. II. This proves clearly that a database recovery by RT3MapEditor can be considered the property of the person who developed the software. Navteq remains the sole owner, protected by his international license.
Indeed, RT3MapEditor only allows you to add or remove a certain POI database that Navteq remains the owner. This is actually the database of the original CD that is in the CD RT3MapEditor modified by the software and not the contrary! Moreover, it is quite possible to modify some elements of the database from Navteq and achieve free backup software RT3MapEditor. There is not a computer genius on the planet!
On the License Agreement RT3MapEditor software, it says " The author grants you the nonexclusive right to use this software as freeware. You can install and use the Software Freeware for non-commercial use only, without limiting time, redistribute the Software Freeware by any means (CDROM, Magazines, Web ...). You can not sell or distribute by any means whatsoever all or part of the maps generated by the Software Freeware .
It is understood in this passage that the person who developed the software RT3MapEditor Navteq protects the sale of CD generated by software RT3MapEditor and not the contrary! In no because the person who developed the software RT3MapEditor can not substitute for Navteq, the legal owner of the database. The concept "maps generated by the Software Freeware" does not mean that supplants RT3MapEditor Navteq, the creator remains Navteq maps. It would be a shame to lose that Navteq ownership of its database cards if they are transferred to a computer through RT3MapEditor or otherwise. In this case, any transfer program, starting with Windows itself would lose its property Navteq Databases. It would be a mega packed! In this case too, even the burning software would be eligible to replace Navteq ... and even RT3MapEditor since this freeware CD does not serious and he is not the latest software through which the Navteq mapping is transferred. A true story of crazy!
Thus, only the Art. L. 122-6-1. II and License Navteq prevail in any license program, shareware or freeware alone! What remains essential is that it is forbidden to use a backup if you do not have the original CD and license, and this regardless The program used to do it.
Conclusion:
- it is accepted that the original CD with license Navteq is accompanied by a backup, especially for theft prevention and / or heat in a vehicle,
- it is accepted that copy generated by the software or not RT3MapEditor be treated as a backup,
- it is accepted that the original CD with Navteq license be transferred to a third person with his backup,
- it is accepted that the possessor an original CD with license to freely use a backup copy, some POIs that have been modified or not with or without RT3MapEditor,
- it is accepted that possessor of an original CD with license to ask a third person to make a backup copy,
- it is accepted that this backup can be achieved by removing or incorporating or POI's choice in the Database Navteq, with or without RT3MapEditor,
- it is accepted that Navteq remaining the sole owner of its databases,
- it is accepted that the person making a backup copy of an original CD with license to do with or without RT3MapEditor,
- it is accepted that this is not RT3MapEditor which allows a backup copy, but the burning software like Nero.
That said, the person who RT3MapEditor developed software would be advised to ask some questions if it does not do so:
1. What is the official position of Navteq versus RT3MapEditor?
2. What is the position of Navteq in relation to laws of the countries (like Germany, Switzerland, etc.). Navteq which forbid putting POIs radars in its original CD while RT3MapEditor can break those laws?
3. What is the position of these countries relative to RT3MapEditor software that allows to break their laws by making illegal CDs and ride illegally on their territory?
4. What is the position users of illegal CDs with edited RT3MapEditor victims from prosecution for illegal conduct, which may take legal action against the author of the software on multiple charges?
5. What is the position of counsel for users of CD changed, adopting the strategy of attacking the author of the software on various charges to clear their clients?
could still pose many more questions about RT3MapEditor. To be continued ...


What a beautiful demonstration of the law you do, Michael C.

For, apart from the fact that we have the right to make a backup copy, everything else looks more like the rantings of a hacker trying clumsily to justify that reasoning based on French law.

You hope RTxMapEditor has received the approval of Navteq. But where do you get an idea so preposterous? On what legislation do you base your hopes?
RTxMapEditor does not violate any law nor European French because it bypasses any measure of protection. And because there are no safeguards in Navteq maps. He did not need approval from anyone to be distributed legally.
While you're there, will you require any Ahead Software, the publisher of Nero that has the approval of Navteq on the pretext that malicious users like you can use it to make pirate copies of their cards? Where do you cons RTxMapEditor is picking up because I ended your organized piracy?

You then try to convince us to prohibit redistribution of the cards RTxMapEditor patched, I would have become "owner" of the Navteq database, and you make references to burning programs should also be a substitute for Navteq. And you conclude with "a true story of fools." My poor
Michel C. You're crazy, actually. As you take the example of burning programs, carefully reread the license of Nero8 (http://www.nero.com/fra/end-user-agreement.html, paragraph C. GENERAL TERMS APPLICABLE TO ALL LICENSES, c.) and d. MPEG4) MP3 and mp3PRO) You will see that the commercial use of Nero8 (ie to generate revenue) is prohibited and only the private use is permitted.
is exactly the same clause, entirely lawful in a license agreement, as used in RTxMapEditor, clause found in the license as Roxio. By redistributing
maps RTxMapEditor modified by you violate the license and you are a pirate. Just like if you use Nero to encode to mp3, burn and sell a music CD that Ahead Software has no right yet.
Remember, Michel C. that the law still applies in its entirety, and that my copyright RTxMapEditor (or those of the publisher of Nero) apply at the same time that the license Navteq, and that any article of French law.

Everyone also appreciate your comment on the license RTxMapEditor. Do you really believe that an author or publisher to write a software license to protect other publishers? Further proof of your great stupidity! RTxMapEditor the license is to protect my rights against thieves like you Michael C!

And you'll finally reach a conclusion as 9 points with the least we can say is that it is silly.

Try therefore to convince a computer scientist and a judge that " it is recognized that this backup can be achieved by removing or incorporating or POI's choice in the Navteq database " and you will laugh at nose . A backup must be consistent with the original, and a map on which you add POI's not! Anyone knows it except you. The only thing they admit is that you are an idiot!

You advise me to finish asking questions about RTxMapEditor, understaffed heard clearly that I am "above the law." But I'm the asked and the answers are so obvious that I do not understand that you have not found the answer yourself, unless of course the only purpose of these questions is to harm the reputation of RTxMapEditor .

If the manufacturers of GPS phones that use Navteq maps of all Europe, if PSA offers radar display on the map Navteq France can do it without any problem, why the hell RTxMapEditor could not do it too? A

we seen a driver that is insensitive to flash beyond the speed limit a complaint against a car manufacturer because his car enabled him to break the law? No! Just because the leader of the offense, the driver.

It's the same when you sell Swiss cards with radars Michel C. It is you who break the laws Helvetic by your illegal use of RT3MapEditor, not me.

Continue to ask questions Michel C. During this time at least you do not hack more RTxMapEditor and I can continue, the world's most legally and never be bothered by anyone or Navteq to provide free RTxMapEditor and enrich regular new features.

0 comments:

Post a Comment